LogFAQs > #940579059

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
Topic''There is no proof necessary for denial'' is not a good argument from atheists
Damn_Underscore
06/12/20 5:59:43 PM
#9:


MKScorpion posted...
Forget proof, how about some evidence? I haven't even seen that yet.

Also, no proof or evidence is a good argument. I could say there is an invisible ice cream shitting taco in the sky, would you believe me just because you can't prove said taco doesn't exist?

The reason people are specifically religious (rather than just "theists") is because they've read, for example, a particular religious book and that was evidence enough for them to believe in that religion. And on top of that, no one is actually certain about anything theology-related which is why faith is considered a virtue is essentially every religion.

So what was evidence for one person to become religious may not be evidence for you to become religious, comparing this evidence to an "invisible ice cream shitting taco in the sky" is not a compelling or really even a respectful argument.

---
Shenmue II = best game of all time
Shenmue = 2nd best game of all time
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1