LogFAQs > #940499114

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicIn retrospect isn't it off message that Farquaad was tiny, ugly and evil looking
averagejoel
06/11/20 12:05:34 PM
#17:


Guns_of_Verdun posted...
But Lord Farquaad? He looks like a tiny ugly evil selfish cruel vindictive man, has the reputation of a tiny ugly evil selfish cruel vindictive man.... then turns out to be a tiny ugly evil selfish cruel vindictive man That seems to counteract what they were doing with everyone else.
I don't think this is entirely accurate. he doesn't have the reputation for being tiny and ugly at the start. Lord Farquad wants to be perceived as bigger, both literally and figuratively (i.e. "more important") than he really is.

(note: it's been a while since I've seen the movie, so I'm going by memory. some of this information might not be entirely accurate)

I believe his first scene is him torturing the gingerbread man, someone much smaller than him. and it's set up to make him appear big.

Duloc is also notably an extremely artificial place (the mechanical dancers saying how "perfect" it is draw obvious parallels to Disneyland, though that's another issue). everything is fake, including Farquad's self-importance.

even when Shrek is fighting the soldiers, Farquad is far above him, giving an appearance of grandeur. just because this facade is shattered fairly early on in the movie doesn't mean it's not there.

Farquad wants to be seen as something he's not, making him a direct foil to Shrek, who wants to be seen as who he is.

---
peanut butter and dick
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1