| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | Why is Neutral Good usually the more popular/common choice? |
| Sahuagin 05/26/20 10:39:15 PM #69: | YoukaiSlayer posted... A villain that has no code would be chaotic evil, and a villain that tries to follow a code but makes exceptions or fails to sometimes would be neutral evil.I think that "a villian that has no code" would be neutral evil. he's looking out for his own interests, regardless of the situation. a villian that despises rules and the people that think following them is worthwhile would be chaotic evil. EvilMegas posted... Batman is not lawful good. He's choatic good.I'm not sure on this one. I could see it interpreted a variety of ways. I might say he's lawful good. he's only a vigilante to the degree that it's needed to make up for Gotham's failures. He's not personally opposed to the law; he's trying to personally make up for what is otherwise a corrupted legal system and help it function. A chaotic good character is a little more like Robin Hood, or maybe rebels in general. --- ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
