LogFAQs > #939534730

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	so the new Batwoman HAS to be of the LGBTQ community
Master Kazuya 05/22/20 6:56:27 AM #10:	Idk I kinda get it though. If one of your defining character's traits is that they are gay, then a gay person is going to be able to do that role better. Like when I watch NPH try to play a straight guy on HIMYM, something feels off. It could be his acting but it never sells me really. When I see Joey Tribbiani or Jack MacFarland, where part of their character is heavily tied into their sexuality, I'm convinced it's a straight or gay guy respectively. If it was just like, oh they want a LGBTQ person for the role even though it's not a defining feature of the char, that would be kinda forced, it should just be acting talent. But if part of their character is heavily tied into their sexuality, I think it only makes sense to have an actor that represents. --- itt my post is the best <cite>Master Kazuya posted [p:939534730] in so the new... [t:78709978]...</cite> <quote>Idk I kinda get it though. If one of your defining character's traits is that they are gay, then a gay person is going to be able to do that role better. Like when I watch NPH try to play a straight guy on HIMYM, something feels off. It could be his acting but it never sells me really. When I see Joey Tribbiani or Jack MacFarland, where part of their character is heavily tied into their sexuality, I'm convinced it's a straight or gay guy respectively. If it was just like, oh they want a LGBTQ person for the role even though it's not a defining feature of the char, that would be kinda forced, it should just be acting talent. But if part of their character is heavily tied into their sexuality, I think it only makes sense to have an actor that represents. --- itt my post is the best</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1