LogFAQs > #938752142

Shablagoo posted...

I explicitly said I wasnt doing that, because I know you arent. I just was pointing out that the users siding with you here are only doing so because they think racism doesnt exist.

I really don't care.

If you think 2 + 2 = 4 because you hate women

And someone else thinks 2 + 2 = 5 because they love dogs.

The first guy is still right even if he is right for the wrong reasons.

And you both need better logic and thought processes. Less non-sequiturs.

Attacking people's character is and always will be dumb.

And at the same time expressing the fact that Im not coming at this case from a hes a racist hillbilly with a gun! perspective, because Im not.

But the clickbait video full of misinformation you keep praising sure does and you keep praising it.

So....

Can you say that if we cant prove Zimmerman guilty we also cant prove Trayvon guilty of assaulting him?

Well obviously since Trayvon wasn't on trial. So he's not guilty of anything by default.

But the evidence is overwhelming.

I reject your bonkers notion that we have to ignore all the evidence just to pretend we don't have a clear picture of what happened. And repeat that even if we do that utterly insane thing for no reason, Zimmerman is still not guilty.

"The evidence says Zimmerman is not guilty."
"What if we ignore it?"
"... Zimmerman is still not guilty."
"What if we ignore it and believe guilty until proven innocent?"
"Zimmerman is still not guilty."
"What if we ignore it and believe guilty until proven innocent and then make shit up?"
"... Zimmerman is still not guilty."
"Man you're so racist."
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair!
https://imgur.com/yPw05Ob