LogFAQs > #938705176

This is one explanation. He didnt want to lead the creepy guy following him back to his home. Another is that he was on the phone with his friend and wanted to finish the call before going inside.

That's silly.

1. He'd got away from the "creepy guy" then turned around to find him again
2. We know that he turned around and went after Zimmerman and what he said to her, so the whole "Wanted to finish the call first" makes no sense. The fight didn't take place at Trayvon's home.

There is no evidence to back up your "explanations" , the existing evidence disproves them and they still don't justify trying to murder someone

None of that matters though because he could have walked up and down the street all night if he wanted nothing illegal about that and its certainly not grounds for charging him with the death penalty.

Agreed. The issue isn't walking down the street the issue is attacking someone.

I wish you'd share that simple fact with Zimmerman too.

Funny how UR has spent hours avoiding watching the video in the OP which destroys all of his points.

If it destroys the points the police made and the evidence that was raised in the trial, you need to pass it on to the florida police.

But it doesn't do that. It just screams clickbait nonsense at people like you who are too scared to look at the trial

None of the shit UR is spewing about the events of that night can be proven. Theres nothing that proves Trayvon started the altercation or wasnt himself acting in self-defense.

Except there is. The evidence from the trial you refuse to look at.

Why won't you go look up the trial?

You keep saying things that are blatantly untrue because some dumb video or blog told you them. But you refuse to actually look at the things that matter.

Shablagoo posted...

So youre just going to ignore that the media also painted Trayvon as some sort of violent criminal for smoking cannabis and skipping school (neither of which are punishable by the fucking death penalty btw)?

EnragedSlith posted...

No, that's reality. There's a long history of this exact sort of bullshit that goes unrecognized because we conveniently leave it out of American history classes. Most people think slavery ended and then there was this civil rights movement, but nobody ever digs into the hundred years between the two. And so we get crap like your argument.

Imagine actually defending a gun-wielding adult who stalked a kid and killed him.

"This is what the police and evidence says."
"No its not."
"Yes it is look."
"Yeah well the police are all liars! So all that evidence actually means the exact opposite!"

It's absurd

You're literally arguing that no matter what reality says, it's a lie and whatever fantasy you created in your mind is correct.

That's a circular argument. There is nothing and no reason to suggest the cops were lying about anything, and the jury agreed with them.

You're on par with anti-vaxxers and climate change deniers here. "Yeah all the evidence and scientists may say that climate change is real but they are liars just trying to get paid so the opposite of what they say is true."

You have no actual point
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair!
https://imgur.com/yPw05Ob