LogFAQs > #938665988

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	George Zimmerman's story is full of holes, embellishments, and lies.
UnfairRepresent 05/05/20 6:48:43 PM #19:	For the record, TC refuses to actually look at the trial and just insults people who prove him wrong He even brags about doing this. He'll look up random vids, blogs and CNN articles that back up what he already believes with rhetoric but won't actually look at the trial, the evidence, the testimony, the police reports etc realnifty1 posted... ChuckSDeuces posted... Didn't most people agree that Zimmerman could have been found guilty if the prosecutors didn't overreach with the murder charge? I mean, it wasn't really their fault though because the public, stupid as they are, demanded murder over manslaughter because they continue to not understand the definitions in law. A manslaughter certainly would have been a more achievable goal. False. Zimmerman got off on basic 101 self-defense laws. His actions were seen as legally valid. Any charge placed against him be it murder, manslaughter, assault etc all would have fallen under the same ruling. The "IF only we pushed Manslaughter" or "If only it wasn't Florida's stand your Ground laws" are a myth the media pulled to try to make the people they duped be angry at the courts rather than angry at the media that lied to them. And it worked sadly. People like you and TC are too proud to go "Damn, I was wrong about something, I needto be more careful about what I accept at face value in the future" and so instead go "Well I'm never wrong and I was mad about this so clearly the courts are wrong and it's all one giant screw up conspiracy" Stand your ground was not used or relevant to the case whatsoever and the charge of murder or manslaughter would have made zero difference. IShall_Run_Amok posted... If he had hit him any harder, he might have been able to survive Zimmerman's murder attempt. That doesn't make any sense "If his attempted murder was successful the other guy couldn't have murdered him." well then you've just admitted the latter was self-defense didn't you? Shablagoo posted... Anything that you say about Martin can also be said of Zimmerman. False. Zimmerman didn't attack Martin. Zimmerman didn't get home, turn around, hide behind a bush and attempt to kill Martin. Not only are you lying, your point is still flawed. Even if you go "Well they both were wrong to walk down a public street" which is absurd. Trayvon's still at fault for attacking. Which is something you can't say of Zimmerman --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! https://imgur.com/yPw05Ob <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:938665988] in George Zim... [t:78660774]...</cite> <quote>For the record, TC refuses to actually look at the trial and just insults people who prove him wrong He even brags about doing this. He'll look up random vids, blogs and CNN articles that back up what he already believes with rhetoric but won't actually look at the trial, the evidence, the testimony, the police reports etc realnifty1 posted...</cite> <quote>ChuckSDeuces posted... Didn't most people agree that Zimmerman could have been found guilty if the prosecutors didn't overreach with the murder charge? I mean, it wasn't really their fault though because the public, stupid as they are, demanded murder over manslaughter because they continue to not understand the definitions in law. A manslaughter certainly would have been a more achievable goal. </quote> False. Zimmerman got off on basic 101 self-defense laws. His actions were seen as legally valid. Any charge placed against him be it murder, manslaughter, assault etc all would have fallen under the same ruling. The "IF only we pushed Manslaughter" or "If only it wasn't Florida's stand your Ground laws" are a myth the media pulled to try to make the people they duped be angry at the courts rather than angry at the media that lied to them. And it worked sadly. People like you and TC are too proud to go "Damn, I was wrong about something, I needto be more careful about what I accept at face value in the future" and so instead go "Well I'm never wrong and I was mad about this so clearly the courts are wrong and it's all one giant screw up conspiracy" Stand your ground was not used or relevant to the case whatsoever and the charge of murder or manslaughter would have made zero difference. IShall_Run_Amok posted...</cite> <quote> If he had hit him any harder, he might have been able to survive Zimmerman's murder attempt. </quote> That doesn't make any sense "If his attempted murder was successful the other guy couldn't have murdered him." well then you've just admitted the latter was self-defense didn't you? Shablagoo posted...</cite> <quote> Anything that you say about Martin can also be said of Zimmerman. </quote> False. Zimmerman didn't attack Martin. Zimmerman didn't get home, turn around, hide behind a bush and attempt to kill Martin. Not only are you lying, your point is still flawed. Even if you go "Well they both were wrong to walk down a public street" which is absurd. Trayvon's still at fault for attacking. Which is something you can't say of Zimmerman --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! https://imgur.com/yPw05Ob</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1