LogFAQs > #938273018

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	White House reportedly considering another round of stimulus checks
Rika_Furude 04/28/20 9:07:46 PM #35:	kayoticdreamz posted... the fundamental problem here is that, no that wouldn't pay for it, and secondly, the first stimulus package wasn't something we could afford and it was over bloated with nonsense(and yes a lot of nonsense was from democrat pork), but how can we afford to pay for a second round of this? Our great great grandchildren are going to be paying this shit back, or we're going to default, and that will get ugly quick. We simply cannot afford this. Furthermore, if you worked in retail on the friday that we got stimulus check number 1....you know what poor people were buying? TVs and xboxs and playstations and bikes and fishing rods and new phones. Not rent, not food. Which is the third flaw in this, people aren't actually using it for food and rent. You didnt explain how it wouldnt pay for it. The rest of your post is completely meaningless and/or irrelevant --- https://imgur.com/oQHLBrx https://imgur.com/ah5IE8D https://imgur.com/USV84z9 https://imgur.com/PSjlohO <cite>Rika_Furude posted [p:938273018] in White Hous... [t:78636174]...</cite> <quote>kayoticdreamz posted... </cite> <quote>the fundamental problem here is that, no that wouldn't pay for it, and secondly, the first stimulus package wasn't something we could afford and it was over bloated with nonsense(and yes a lot of nonsense was from democrat pork), but how can we afford to pay for a second round of this? Our great great grandchildren are going to be paying this shit back, or we're going to default, and that will get ugly quick. We simply cannot afford this. Furthermore, if you worked in retail on the friday that we got stimulus check number 1....you know what poor people were buying? TVs and xboxs and playstations and bikes and fishing rods and new phones. Not rent, not food. Which is the third flaw in this, people aren't actually using it for food and rent.</quote>You didnt explain how it wouldnt pay for it. The rest of your post is completely meaningless and/or irrelevant --- https://imgur.com/oQHLBrx https://imgur.com/ah5IE8D https://imgur.com/USV84z9 https://imgur.com/PSjlohO</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1