LogFAQs > #937322204

gunplagirl posted...

There's a pretty clear answer and it's to not discriminate against an entire group of minorities. And like, "we're being civil, just denying equality to an entire group of people based on one characteristic" is effing hilarious, cognitive dissonance is a hell of a thing.

What "weight" do you want, would you ask the same of someone if they said that a woman was being sexist for saying something about men and pigs?

So are you actually claiming the 179 people who voted in agreement are ignorant and transphobic?

It's a genuine physical advantage and it's not just one basic characteristic. It's also causing resentment and drama between feminists and the LGBTQ but that's just because they are all pigs, right?

It's pretty clear cut that I don't think you actually really care about sports, you care about inclusion but the simple fact is sports will never be all inclusive (on a professional level) because that goes against the very nature of the activity. There's for fun and there is world record based activities and that's why you saw no trans-athelete participate in the 2016 Olympics despite it being legal.

---

AirFresh - Voted the hottest content creator on The FAQs'
#KeepItFresh