LogFAQs > #937307157

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicDo you agree with Idaho banning trans-atheletes?
tennisdude818
04/13/20 9:58:03 AM
#57:


ssjevot posted...
Yes it would need to be tailored to each sport, but that's already how it works. MMA and Boxing are massively popular along with many other sports that are already "a bunch of divisions", so it's not the simple. I personally enjoy that for example a featherweight and heavyweight fight differ substantially. It's not fair for a heavyweight to fight a featherweight (the beginnings of UFC actually did this though), but seeing the best within their own division is just as enjoyable because they don't fight the same way.

It would be extremely complicated and unnecessary in a lot if sports. Is this just to accommodate trans athletes? A much simpler solution would be to have 2 divisions: a "Cis Female" division and an "Open" division.

---
"Those who need leaders are not qualified to choose them." -Michael Malice
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1