LogFAQs > #936486146

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Gamespot gives RE3 remake a 6/10
brokeNoKaSH420 03/30/20 2:11:45 PM #80:	UnfairRepresent posted... RE3 wasn't rushed, it just wasn't supposed to be RE3. It was supposed to be RE: Nemesis. A side game like Dead Aim and the like. Code Veronica was supposed to be RE3. But there was some businsess issue where Capcom had agreed with Sony that all the main RE games would be on Sony consoles. So they shoved Jill in it, renamed it and boom. That's why it seems smaller, it was a smaller project. Not a rushed one. There's a lot of conflicting info but the version most consistent using dates is that CV was never going to be numbered and that re3 was kinda rushed <cite>brokeNoKaSH420 posted [p:936486146] in Gamespot g... [t:78522390]...</cite> <quote>UnfairRepresent posted... </cite> <quote>RE3 wasn't rushed, it just wasn't supposed to be RE3. It was supposed to be RE: Nemesis. A side game like Dead Aim and the like. Code Veronica was supposed to be RE3. But there was some businsess issue where Capcom had agreed with Sony that all the main RE games would be on Sony consoles. So they shoved Jill in it, renamed it and boom. That's why it seems smaller, it was a smaller project. Not a rushed one.</quote>There's a lot of conflicting info but the version most consistent using dates is that CV was never going to be numbered and that re3 was kinda rushed </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1