LogFAQs > #934044921

I never, never see this done this way, but it seems like the fastest way to do a for loop.

Instead of

for (int i = 0; i < something; i++)
{
...
}

for (int i = 0; i++ < something;)
{
...
}

I heard adding ++ to the end of an integer while reading basically has no performance loss. Doing it this way basically removes an opcode from every loop, right? I know for loops produce less garbage than foreach.

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZNqaAh6iLU