LogFAQs > #933753355

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Imagine not allowing evidence or witnesses in a trial.
Mead 01/31/20 6:52:53 PM #19:	aDirtyShisno posted... And what new evidence has been discovered that was not already available for the House to consider? The witnesses that are being proposed by the House are the same witnesses that the House deemed of its own accord not to be necessary to the impeachment. The testimony they could give now is identical to the testimony they could have given then. Unless there is some new development that literally occurred after the House impeachment hearings but prior to the Senate trial the House has already declared any testimony the proposed witnesses could give as being nil. the White House literally blocked multiple witnesses from testifying and has advised the NSA not to turn over relevant evidence during the house inquiry --- Lemonheads <cite>Mead posted [p:933753355] in Imagine no... [t:78373431]...</cite> <quote>aDirtyShisno posted... </cite> <quote>And what new evidence has been discovered that was not already available for the House to consider? The witnesses that are being proposed by the House are the same witnesses that the House deemed of its own accord not to be necessary to the impeachment. The testimony they could give now is identical to the testimony they could have given then. Unless there is some new development that literally occurred after the House impeachment hearings but prior to the Senate trial the House has already declared any testimony the proposed witnesses could give as being nil.</quote> the White House literally blocked multiple witnesses from testifying and has advised the NSA not to turn over relevant evidence during the house inquiry --- Lemonheads</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1