LogFAQs > #933752736

Mead posted...

there still isnt any reason to not allow new relevant testimony or evidence aside from participating in a cover up

if trump did nothing wrong and is being impeached for a perfect phone call then there surely must be at least one example of exonerating evidence, no?

And what new evidence has been discovered that was not already available for the House to consider? The witnesses that are being proposed by the House are the same witnesses that the House deemed of its own accord not to be necessary to the impeachment. The testimony they could give now is identical to the testimony they could have given then. Unless there is some new development that literally occurred after the House impeachment hearings but prior to the Senate trial the House has already declared any testimony the proposed witnesses could give as being nil.

---

Que sera, sera. Whatever happens, happens.
...and he was never heard from again.