LogFAQs > #933747253

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 262: Witless Protection
LordoftheMorons 01/31/20 4:18:52 PM #409:	HeroDelTiempo17 posted... The question itself hinged the loss of court and constitutional credibility on the fact that the trial is a sham without witnesses and evidence, which can be fixed by his vote. Also don't think controversial to point out that Republicans aren't putting the Chief Justice in a great position, but it's possible Roberts feels otherwise. If that's the case, she should have phrased it in a way that suggested that he/the Court would lose legitimacy if he was in a position to decide these things but didn't; otherwise it really makes no sense to say that it reflects on them rather than solely on the Senate GOP. --- Congrats to Advokaiser for winning the CBX Guru Challenge! <cite>LordoftheMorons posted [p:933747253] in Politics C... [t:78366000]...</cite> <quote>HeroDelTiempo17 posted... </cite> <quote>The question itself hinged the loss of court and constitutional credibility on the fact that the trial is a sham without witnesses and evidence, which can be fixed by his vote. Also don't think controversial to point out that Republicans aren't putting the Chief Justice in a great position, but it's possible Roberts feels otherwise.</quote>If that's the case, she should have phrased it in a way that suggested that he/the Court would lose legitimacy if he was in a position to decide these things but didn't; otherwise it really makes no sense to say that it reflects on them rather than solely on the Senate GOP. --- Congrats to Advokaiser for winning the CBX Guru Challenge!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1