LogFAQs > #933661145

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Who would win in an actual fight between Connor McGregor and Undertaker
Panthera 01/29/20 6:45:21 PM #13:	jedisamurai posted... A pro MMA fighter but he weighs like 150. And Undertaker isn't Joe Schmo on his couch, hes an (former) athlete. I'm thinking UTs height and weight advantages are significant here. And never discount "old man strength" when it counts. What's the line? Not as good as I once was, but as good once as I ever was.... The size and strength (well, at one point he was much stronger, idk about how big the gap is now) advantage is a big deal for sure...the problem is, Undertaker is a broken down 54 year old with a long history of injuries from a career of putting his body through hell. I don't think he's in any condition to fight any sort of serious opponent at this stage in his life. --- Meow! <cite>Panthera posted [p:933661145] in Who would ... [t:78368696]...</cite> <quote>jedisamurai posted... </cite> <quote>A pro MMA fighter but he weighs like 150. And Undertaker isn't Joe Schmo on his couch, hes an (former) athlete. I'm thinking UTs height and weight advantages are significant here. And never discount "old man strength" when it counts. What's the line? Not as good as I once was, but as good once as I ever was....</quote> The size and strength (well, at one point he was much stronger, idk about how big the gap is now) advantage is a big deal for sure...the problem is, Undertaker is a broken down 54 year old with a long history of injuries from a career of putting his body through hell. I don't think he's in any condition to fight any sort of serious opponent at this stage in his life. --- Meow!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1