LogFAQs > #932217373

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Do you agree with canceling someone over something they said 10+ years ago?
wackyteen 12/29/19 9:39:24 PM #1:	Do you? Let's say it's an ill-advised tweet that's bad but not the worst thing ever. Yes, you need to be held accountable for every idle thought and message you ever thought or said Yes, but only if said individual doesn't apologize or offer some form of take back for it Yes, but only if they double down on it Maybe, depends on the person more than the message No, unless they're also a generally awful person No, it'd have to be truly awfully terrible and they'd have to show no remorse for their words Canceling is stupid Do you? Let's say it's an ill-advised tweet that's bad but not the worst thing ever. - Results (14 votes) Yes, you need to be held accountable for every idle thought and message you ever thought or said 7.14% (1 vote) 1 Yes, but only if said individual doesn't apologize or offer some form of take back for it 14.29% (2 votes) 2 Yes, but only if they double down on it 7.14% (1 vote) 1 Maybe, depends on the person more than the message 0% (0 votes) 0 No, unless they're also a generally awful person 14.29% (2 votes) 2 No, it'd have to be truly awfully terrible and they'd have to show no remorse for their words 42.86% (6 votes) 6 Canceling is stupid 14.29% (2 votes) 2 Do you? --- The name is wackyteen* for a reason. Never doubt. No longer teen <cite>wackyteen posted [p:932217373] in Do you agr... [t:78291715]...</cite> <quote> Do you? Let's say it's an ill-advised tweet that's bad but not the worst thing ever. Yes, you need to be held accountable for every idle thought and message you ever thought or said Yes, but only if said individual doesn't apologize or offer some form of take back for it Yes, but only if they double down on it Maybe, depends on the person more than the message No, unless they're also a generally awful person No, it'd have to be truly awfully terrible and they'd have to show no remorse for their words Canceling is stupid Vote View Results Do you? Let's say it's an ill-advised tweet that's bad but not the worst thing ever. - Results (14 votes) Yes, you need to be held accountable for every idle thought and message you ever thought or said 7.14% (1 vote) 1 Yes, but only if said individual doesn't apologize or offer some form of take back for it 14.29% (2 votes) 2 Yes, but only if they double down on it 7.14% (1 vote) 1 Maybe, depends on the person more than the message 0% (0 votes) 0 No, unless they're also a generally awful person 14.29% (2 votes) 2 No, it'd have to be truly awfully terrible and they'd have to show no remorse for their words 42.86% (6 votes) 6 Canceling is stupid 14.29% (2 votes) 2 Show Voting Form Do you? --- The name is wackyteen for a reason. Never doubt. *No longer teen</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1