LogFAQs > #932187265

OniRonin posted...

ctrl +f for the word valid please

So, you just don't understand what the article is saying. I understand. When you learn what "appeal to authority" means, how about you come back so we can continue this discussion. Also, why are you using "appeal to authority" if you don't know what it means? Because you clearly don't, since you seem to think it means something completely different.

Also, why tell me to search for the word valid. Searching for one word does nothing. How you ctrl +F for the sentence

It's important to note that this fallacy should not be used to dismiss the claims of experts, or scientific consensus.

And one last thing. You don't get to the right to use "ad honimem" and think people will take you seriously, when you do it yourself. Which you've done twice. Calling me a troll because you didn't clearly state your question. And then trying to take down my argument with you "please come back when you get to college buddy" statement.

FatalAccident posted...

lmfao this some garbage level trolling

dude comes back with ad hominem like its supposed to make him look smart

lmfaooo pls stop

This...

Lokarin posted...

That's incorrect. It would be ad hominem if they said your argument is wrong because you are idiot (their words, not mine).

That it just a regular insult.

It's ok, Lok. He's just saying stuff that he thinks will make him look smart. He's be using "ad hominem" and "appeal to authority" without knowing what they mean because he thinks that'll win him the argument. But they won't if you don't know what they mean or how to use them. He also thinks anyone cares when they say it. It's just a way for him to dismiss that person, while also using the argument of "I win because I say so."

So, FatalAccident is correct here...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.