LogFAQs > #932155491

Josiah_Is_Back posted...

He became synonymous with WrestleMania, WWE's most lucrative show every year. How is that not a draw for the company?

And at what point did he become synonymous with WrestleMania? Was that before or after Austin and the Rock help boom the business for them? There was a period when Hogan left where it was Shawn Michaels Bret Hart Diesel and Undertaker. And you know what they did before Austin and Rock came along? Nothing.

WWE was going to be cancelled after WrestleMania in 1998 because USA couldn't justify having them. Then Mike Tyson came along to help legitimize Stone Cold. So if none of that happens undertaker is never synonymous with anything. They over hype taker because he's the one guy who was extremely loyal to Vince. And that's probably because if you saw his work before being the undertaker, he couldn't make it without that gimmick at all.

I am not trying to shit on the undertaker. But to see him on some people's lists over the Rock or even John Cena is kind of insane. Taker never helped raised business. Being synonymous with WrestleMania isn't an undertaker thing. It's a WWE brand thing.

---

What about me? What about my sig?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsszagC0GdI Total Package.