LogFAQs > #932144517

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
Topiclol 2000+ upvotes for this?
Yellow
12/28/19 1:04:44 AM
#27:


Yeah, outside of a human's bias. But then again morality is human bias designed to keep society intact.

If morality was logically consistent (it isn't) we would measure how self aware something is and treat it with exactly that much respect, from rock to human.

Killing something like a cow? An intelligent creature. Pretty comparable to killing a human. But then I eat cows, which means in my eyes I commit a murder pretty much every day, because like the rest of you, I'm petty and am willing to kill as long as it means I get my burger. I just go without the cognitive dissonance and look at it with a more nihilistic view, figuring I would have done it anyway and might as well be honest.

If there were really zero consequences to anyone's actions, we would all be horrible psychopaths. If there was no punishment, and no negative emotions to go with it (feeling guilty, relating to the victim and feeling it secondhand). That is what I see when people eat beef and pork.

---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1