LogFAQs > #931889039

Kyuubi4269 posted...

That has nothing to do with arson, hate crimes or harassment. It gives no reasoning to this case as it's unrelated.

Your exact statement was "the maximum sentence shouldn't be that high in any situation." The presentation of a situation in which the maximum sentence should be that high is absolutely related to that statement. It doesn't need to be related to the case in this topic, just to the much broader statement you made.

OrangeDawn posted...

Repeat offender
not remorseful
stolen property
hate crime
arson

15 sounds fine. Hell probably be out earlier anyway

Pretty much. Again, this is a blatant, unrepentant threat to a large number of people. He's done stuff like this before, he's explicitly stated that he intends to keep doing such things as long as he's able, so it's best to take away that ability before he hurts someone. He himself has insisted that he won't change his mind and become less dangerous, so it's only sensible to ensure he doesn't have the ability to hurt anyone else for as long as is possible. He repents, then he can appeal for a shorter sentence.