LogFAQs > #930539232

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The Admiral is WARNED
Machete 11/22/19 3:27:45 PM #180:	AssultTank posted... You know, FrisbeeDude gets the same treatment as Admiral and I think he has spent less time out of purg in the last year than Admiral has... Generally speaking, older accounts have value to the user, banning them is final and takes away any incentive that user had to behave. What tends to happen with people like Admiral and some others ITT is that they wait for their history to clear before jumping back into the same shit they did before. This period of good behavior is exactly what Allen wants. If you ban an account, you take away the incentive to behave and wind up with someone who has no reason to not just spam alts and rule breaking content. Based on observational data this philosophy works... Well then why is Hey no longer active here after losing hundreds or maybe thousands of accounts including tenured FrankIin? Why does 462 now behave himself mostly after losing over 100? Why does muffinz0rz cause less trouble now that he's lost half the NFL roster in accounts? And why does the user in post #177 now only dogwhistle troll me instead of full-on harassing me after losing a bunch of accounts for it? Observational data for the banning argument shows that works as well. Just saying. --- #TreacherousTrump #LockTrumpUp <cite>Machete posted [p:930539232] in The Admira... [t:78183576]...</cite> <quote>AssultTank posted...</cite> <quote>You know, FrisbeeDude gets the same treatment as Admiral and I think he has spent less time out of purg in the last year than Admiral has... Generally speaking, older accounts have value to the user, banning them is final and takes away any incentive that user had to behave. What tends to happen with people like Admiral and some others ITT is that they wait for their history to clear before jumping back into the same shit they did before. This period of good behavior is exactly what Allen wants. If you ban an account, you take away the incentive to behave and wind up with someone who has no reason to not just spam alts and rule breaking content. Based on observational data this philosophy works... </quote> Well then why is Hey no longer active here after losing hundreds or maybe thousands of accounts including tenured FrankIin? Why does 462 now behave himself mostly after losing over 100? Why does muffinz0rz cause less trouble now that he's lost half the NFL roster in accounts? And why does the user in post #177 now only dogwhistle troll me instead of full-on harassing me after losing a bunch of accounts for it? Observational data for the banning argument shows that works as well. Just saying. --- #TreacherousTrump #LockTrumpUp</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1