She just referred to missing half the pokedex as "nitpicking" (at 6:12 is when it begins)
"I'd still like better cutscenes, companion pokemon, complete pokedex, and a more visually interesting wild area, but nitpicks are just not very effective when everything else was such a complete joy to play"
The way she totally buries it in there is such a damage control attempt. Like it's "oh just another nitpick"
It's half the fucking pokedex. That alone would drop it off two full points of any review, and that's assuming everything else is completely 10/10.
No, it's nitpicking
Less than half the pokedex
is not a nitpick
A game being good or bad has nothing to do about the over abundance of monsters.
Street Fighter removing characters is not worth removing points from a review unless there is an extremely slim roster.
How many pokemon are in this game
Let me answer your question with another question
Why is the game better with fewer?
Because they spent time building a new world and the reviewers agree