LogFAQs > #929758444

Lopen posted...

Nelson_Mandela posted...

I think it was very clinically manufactured in order to sell tickets to Endgame, rather than an artistic decision.

I think there are a lot less risky ways to do that that don't tank Endgame's ticket sales in the least. You basically got all the legwork you needed for hyping tickets when you spent a dozen movies worth of hype building to that one moment and put "Part 2" on it. For as many people that get a bit more hyped, there are angry parents that don't want to take their kids to Endgame. If it was truly about being safe, cutting a bit before the big battle would have been much easier.

I think the point he was making is that there was nothing "risky" about IW's ending in the slightest, which is correct

It's an awesome ending, but anyone who thinks that it's shocking or creative or actually dark is exactly the type of shill that Scorsese is talking about probably