LogFAQs > #929053947

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Trump campaign sells 'Get Over It' T-shirts
karlpilkington4 10/21/19 2:18:17 PM #123:	CableZL posted... karlpilkington4 posted... So did he or did he not say- "The holding of the money had nothing to do with Biden"? I think you're confused about something. He said it had nothing to do with Biden, but admitted that pressuring Ukraine to investigate the DNC server was part of the reason the funds were held up. Again, the latter is indeed a quid pro quo, and would be an extra stipulation placed on releasing the funds that Congress had already allocated. That's unconstitutional. After the press briefing, Mulvaney walked back his previous remarks, claiming that the media had "misconstrued" his comments "to advance a biased and political witch hunt against President Trump," adding, Let me be clear, there was absolutely no quid pro quo between Ukrainian military aid and any investigation into the 2016 election." There ya go. From his own words. There was no quid pro quo. Not sure what else there is to argue. You seem to think an edited video and a back and fourth argument with an interviewer is some sort of proof of anything. --- Is This The Krusty Krab? "No This Is Patrick!" <cite>karlpilkington4 posted [p:929053947] in Trump camp... [t:78101050]...</cite> <quote>CableZL posted...</cite> <quote>karlpilkington4 posted...</cite> <quote>So did he or did he not say- "The holding of the money had nothing to do with Biden"?</quote> I think you're confused about something. He said it had nothing to do with Biden, but admitted that pressuring Ukraine to investigate the DNC server was part of the reason the funds were held up. Again, the latter is indeed a quid pro quo, and would be an extra stipulation placed on releasing the funds that Congress had already allocated. That's unconstitutional.</quote> After the press briefing, Mulvaney walked back his previous remarks, claiming that the media had "misconstrued" his comments "to advance a biased and political witch hunt against President Trump," adding, Let me be clear, there was absolutely no quid pro quo between Ukrainian military aid and any investigation into the 2016 election." There ya go. From his own words. There was no quid pro quo. Not sure what else there is to argue. You seem to think an edited video and a back and fourth argument with an interviewer is some sort of proof of anything. --- Is This The Krusty Krab? "No This Is Patrick!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1