LogFAQs > #928277812

Reg posted...

The primary frustration with the Guyger case is (or at least should be) that she is a cop, and is very obviously getting favorable treatment because of it. Whether you think she should've been sentenced harsher or her sentence should be the fairly applied standard is a debate you can have. But people are absolutely allowed to be frustrated with the system as it currently exists and how certain types of individual get favorable treatment because of it.

Anything beyond that is silly. This trial ended basically as it should have.

Yeah, well said. This case existing alongside other cases where the standard of fairness is not applied is what is frustrating. The Crystal Mason case is one I see brought up a lot, because both are in Texas.

https://www.texasobserver.org/the-casualties-of-texas-war-on-voter-fraud/

5 years in prison for a felon on probation attempting to vote, but she had used a provisional ballot designed for the exact purpose of letting people unsure of voting status to attempt to. The ballot of course was thrown out so she didn't even actually vote! Still convicted and pending appeal.

---

DPOblivion was far more determined than me.