LogFAQs > #927953851

Gamerguymass posted...

EzeDoesIt posted...

Well, historians disagree with all that, and I dont really see why your first paragraph is relevant. Does The Rock not exist because its not his given name? Jesus Christ is obviously a title. It means the Anointed Messiah. Jesus/Joshua/Yeshua basically meant something like hero.

Someone has poor reading comprehension skills. "Jesus" wasn't written about until decades later by people that weren't there. So if there really was someone that tried standing up to the Romans but his name was unknown decades latter then he most likely would have just been given the name Jesus as it was the most popular name at the time. We do the same thing today when we don't know someone's name, they are referred to as "John Doe."

None of this contradicts anything in my post.

Also claiming historians disagree with all that without actually providing any evidence is not an argument. Especially considering historians is where I learned it from in the first place. So obviously not all historians disagree.

Right but most do.
---

Not changing this sig.