LogFAQs > #926737974

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Man jailed for nearly 3 months after airport claimed he had liquid meth
CableZL 08/30/19 11:23:00 AM #18:	Paragon21XX posted... CableZL posted... "A specially trained drug sniffing dog was alerted to the presence of a controlled dangerous substance and a preliminary test done by the police officers further tested positive for a controlled dangerous substance," the office said. "The confirmatory laboratory test showed (there) was no controlled dangerous substance inside the honey." The dog probably just wanted some honey We really shouldn't be using dogs for this purpose. They didn't use only dogs. I know you read the part that they also used a quick chemistry test to verify that it had meth in it (which also ended up being a false positive in the end). Shitty situation, but until the formal lab test came back clean, there was no way out of having double confirmations against him. Yeah, I'm just saying we shouldn't be using dogs for this purpose. Unless dogs suddenly start speaking fluent English or whatever other human language, there's no way we can really know what they're "signalling." --- https://i.imgtc.com/d9Fc4Qq.gif https://i.imgtc.com/BKHTxYq.gif https://i.imgtc.com/vYYIuDx.jpg <cite>CableZL posted [p:926737974] in Man jailed... [t:77970929]...</cite> <quote>Paragon21XX posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CableZL posted...</cite> <quote>"A specially trained drug sniffing dog was alerted to the presence of a controlled dangerous substance and a preliminary test done by the police officers further tested positive for a controlled dangerous substance," the office said. "The confirmatory laboratory test showed (there) was no controlled dangerous substance inside the honey." The dog probably just wanted some honey We really shouldn't be using dogs for this purpose.</quote> They didn't use only dogs. I know you read the part that they also used a quick chemistry test to verify that it had meth in it (which also ended up being a false positive in the end). Shitty situation, but until the formal lab test came back clean, there was no way out of having double confirmations against him.</quote> Yeah, I'm just saying we shouldn't be using dogs for this purpose. Unless dogs suddenly start speaking fluent English or whatever other human language, there's no way we can really know what they're "signalling." --- https://i.imgtc.com/d9Fc4Qq.gif https://i.imgtc.com/BKHTxYq.gif https://i.imgtc.com/vYYIuDx.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1