Genderless figures, gods that punished people by swapping bodies, eunuchs, and women dressing as men to get into the military aren't evidence of transsexualism in history.
I'm not saying there were no trans people in history, but desperately padding history with them by redefining everything that isn't blatantly hetero or homosexual as trans reeks of trying to redefine history for your own purposes.
Half the things mentioned in that list, if you go to their individual wikipedia pages, make no mention of any relation to transsexualism. Just going from the first paragraph, the Sumerian Gala were genderless, and the Roman galli were eunuchs, and the Indian Hijras were eunuchs who also took hermaphrodites into their ranks.
What category do you think genderless, agender, and/or nongender conforming people typically fall under?
genderless, agender, and nongender conforming. AKA their own categories. Not transgender.
Unless we're saying LGBT is the new forever acronym and the T stands for "everything else". ---
"History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz