LogFAQs > #926411253

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	I'm not a vegetarian or vegan but those seem like morally superior options
s0nicfan 08/22/19 3:30:33 PM #37:	shockthemonkey posted... Saying "you could not" is also not an argument for a morality of one choice over the other. You also have the capacity to choose to give money to random strangers, therefore is it immoral because you do not? I missed this earlier but are you honestly trying to argue that its equally moral to give money to strangers as it is to not if you can afford to do it? I absolutely think that, between two people with the same financial capacity and all other things completely equal, the person who gives more of his money to strangers is morally better than the person who doesnt. You could not absolutely plays into this. Its not a choice for survival, its an option taken for pleasure at the expense of the animals who suffer and die. I'm saying the availability of a choice does not itself imply one choice is moral and the other is immoral. --- "History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz <cite>s0nicfan posted [p:926411253] in I'm not a ... [t:77957058]...</cite> <quote>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><quote>Saying "you could not" is also not an argument for a morality of one choice over the other. You also have the capacity to choose to give money to random strangers, therefore is it immoral because you do not?</quote> I missed this earlier but are you honestly trying to argue that its equally moral to give money to strangers as it is to not if you can afford to do it? I absolutely think that, between two people with the same financial capacity and all other things completely equal, the person who gives more of his money to strangers is morally better than the person who doesnt. You could not absolutely plays into this. Its not a choice for survival, its an option taken for pleasure at the expense of the animals who suffer and die.</quote> I'm saying the availability of a choice does not itself imply one choice is moral and the other is immoral. --- "History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1