LogFAQs > #926000844

Zeeak4444 posted...

Wouldnt it be more fair to say anyone born within x range of event then though? Like say 6 months to compensate for after shock ripples and shit.

But after that point wouldnt things have normalized enough for things to have steadied out along the same timeline? Especially for people with little to no direct impact from it?

Sorta but not really like a schrodinger's cat situation.

Edit: as for the morality of it see my last post. I dont think I would do it myself.

It might have a few pockets of realignment for some people. But odds are that a large majority of people 19 and under would be affected. Especially with the shootings (or lack of shootings) that will follow without Columbine to be brought back into the limelight.

Once you get that first wave of new people being born though, that's when the butterfly effect would be taken into account. Everyone that lost generation would have interacted with would now be interacted with differently. Again, it only takes sex being off by an inch or a second to throw that (low end average) 1 in 40 million into jeopardy.
---

"If history is to change, let it change! If the world is to be destroyed, so be it! If my fate is to be destroyed...I must simply laugh!!."- Magus