LogFAQs > #925761896

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	16 y/o RACIST CATHOLIC Kid who threatened to KILL Black People was NOT A CRIME!
LinkPizza 08/07/19 4:59:54 PM #44:	Kyuubi4269 posted... LinkPizza posted... There were times when police could have looked a little deeper to stop something. Not every case can be looked at close enough. Certain tragedies that happened that were avoidable is police had just taken the time to investigate should be reason enough... And in those circumstances, it is unreasonable to search someone who, until found guilty, is an innocent man to such an extent. It is not reasonable to pry too deeply without good reason. The sociopathy of one is not good reason to invade and disrupt the lives of many. How are you suppose to find someone guilty without evidence. Because no one should ever be found guilty without evidence of some kind. But when looking for evidence, they can look for evidence to prove or disprove guilt. Thats what an investigation is for. Youre the one that seems to think investigation automatically means guilt... Kyuubi4269 posted... LinkPizza posted... Sometimes they do. There are cases where they didnt. Or didnt look closely enough. Which is not good... Again, not reasonable to treat a presumed innocent person as though they are guilty. Everything is simple in retrospect. But I dont think its wrong to investigate. Investigating doesnt mean youre guilty. It just means theyre investigating. --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:925761896] in 16 y/o RAC... [t:77921025]...</cite> <quote>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>There were times when police could have looked a little deeper to stop something. Not every case can be looked at close enough. Certain tragedies that happened that were avoidable is police had just taken the time to investigate should be reason enough...</quote> And in those circumstances, it is unreasonable to search someone who, until found guilty, is an innocent man to such an extent. It is not reasonable to pry too deeply without good reason. The sociopathy of one is not good reason to invade and disrupt the lives of many.</quote> How are you suppose to find someone guilty without evidence. Because no one should ever be found guilty without evidence of some kind. But when looking for evidence, they can look for evidence to prove or disprove guilt. Thats what an investigation is for. Youre the one that seems to think investigation automatically means guilt... Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>Sometimes they do. There are cases where they didnt. Or didnt look closely enough. Which is not good...</quote> Again, not reasonable to treat a presumed innocent person as though they are guilty. Everything is simple in retrospect.</quote> But I dont think its wrong to investigate. Investigating doesnt mean youre guilty. It just means theyre investigating. --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1