LogFAQs > #925749091

Kyuubi4269 posted...

LinkPizza posted...

Sure. Whatever. Though, with most normal people, you can tell what's an actual threat, and what's not. And like people were saying earlier, it has to be reasonable. A Karen saying you were threatening them because you would give them something you own, like your wheelchair, isn't reasonable.

Those people would be me, that was my whole argument.

You're the Karen or the other person? If you're the Karen, then you deserve whatever you get. Like making a false police report or whatever. If you're the other person that she said was threatening her, then it should be deemed unreasonable and you would be fine. I don't see the problem here...

Kyuubi4269 posted...

LinkPizza posted...

As for you example, it doesn't matter if only one person sees that as a threat, because not everybody does. And most normal people won't see it that way. And in the end, if some random person calls the cops on you for that, most cops are just going to leave.

That's the problem. The police determined it unreasonable to be deemed a threat, but Mooreandrew seems to believe we should ignore whether it's a credible threat because violence is scary.

I believe he was saying it had to be credible, too. Also, it sounds like he's saying it should be looked at more. Or that more threats should be looked at closely. Which isn't a bad idea. Instead of just blowing off all threats, at least take a look or something. Like if they make a threat on Facebook, it wouldn't be a bad idea to maybe check what else they have been saying. It doesn't mean you have to run out to arrest them if it doesn't seem credible. But at least checking could possibly save lives if they think the threat is reasonable and have evidence to believe they might do whatever they said they would...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.