LogFAQs > #925457861

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Woodstock 50 officially cancelled
dib153 07/31/19 10:45:17 PM #24:	MagnusX posted... dib153 posted... Solid Sonic posted... dib153 posted... its been off and on and off again for months. I honestly dont see what tye big deal is anyway. Woodstock 69 was a shit festival, look at the show list, you'll recognize maybe 3 names. modern Woodstock likely follows the same pattern of mediocrity Are you nuts? Several of the performers are quintessential 70s, particularly Santana, The Who, and Jimi Hendrix but it's certainly not limited to them (The Grateful Dead, CCR, and Janis Joplin certainly strike chords in 70s music aficionados). you literally listed the ONLY names worth a damn from tye whole event. when youve got 26 sets over 3 days and only 7 of them are worth a fuck your festival is kinda bunk ~~you didnt even bring up Crosby Stills and Nash, smh~~ Please point us to another festival in 1969 that had a "better" lineup. I can't. and I'm not arguing against it being THE event of 69 I'm ragging on its general legacy. everybody praises it as this big drug fueled fuckfest of a concert, blasting jams you coyld hear across state lines......but id wager 80% of tye event was rather unremarkable in the grand scheme of festivals, Woodstock seems pretty.....meh --- "Dib is my new hero. Epic insult man, epic to the max" ~ Drakona <cite>dib153 posted [p:925457861] in Woodstock ... [t:77905300]...</cite> <quote>MagnusX posted...</cite> <quote>dib153 posted...</cite> <quote>Solid Sonic posted...</cite> <quote>dib153 posted... </cite> <quote>its been off and on and off again for months. I honestly dont see what tye big deal is anyway. Woodstock 69 was a shit festival, look at the show list, you'll recognize maybe 3 names. modern Woodstock likely follows the same pattern of mediocrity</quote>Are you nuts? Several of the performers are quintessential 70s, particularly Santana, The Who, and Jimi Hendrix but it's certainly not limited to them (The Grateful Dead, CCR, and Janis Joplin certainly strike chords in 70s music aficionados). </quote> you literally listed the ONLY names worth a damn from tye whole event. when youve got 26 sets over 3 days and only 7 of them are worth a fuck your festival is kinda bunk you didnt even bring up Crosby Stills and Nash, smh</quote> Please point us to another festival in 1969 that had a "better" lineup.</quote> I can't. and I'm not arguing against it being THE event of 69 I'm ragging on its general legacy. everybody praises it as this big drug fueled fuckfest of a concert, blasting jams you coyld hear across state lines......but id wager 80% of tye event was rather unremarkable in the grand scheme of festivals, Woodstock seems pretty.....meh --- "Dib is my new hero. Epic insult man, epic to the max" ~ Drakona</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1