LogFAQs > #925371500

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Are Witcher 1/2 crucial to the lore, or can someone jump straight into 3?
Axl_Rose_85 07/30/19 7:38:31 AM #10:	Nanis23 posted... Are Witcher 1 and 2 worth playing? did they age like milk? Witcher 1 is a pain in the ass to play. It has aged like milk left outside in the heat for a while. Witcher 2 was a flawed game that can be boring and tedious at times but overall it is ok. Even though I never saw the game all the way through I can see people loving this style of game enjoying it. Now Witcher 3, it is possibly the best WRPG I have played besides Mass Effect 2. It has aged like fine wine even though that wine has been only 4 years. <cite>Axl_Rose_85 posted [p:925371500] in Are Witche... [t:77899956]...</cite> <quote>Nanis23 posted...</cite> <quote>Are Witcher 1 and 2 worth playing? did they age like milk?</quote> Witcher 1 is a pain in the ass to play. It has aged like milk left outside in the heat for a while. Witcher 2 was a flawed game that can be boring and tedious at times but overall it is ok. Even though I never saw the game all the way through I can see people loving this style of game enjoying it. Now Witcher 3, it is possibly the best WRPG I have played besides Mass Effect 2. It has aged like fine wine even though that wine has been only 4 years.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1