LogFAQs > #924984257

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicDreamcast vs. X-Box (original) vs. Wii U
streamofthesky
07/21/19 12:57:18 PM
#15:


Wii U > Dreamcast > Xbox

Two systems that had great games and were killed off way too quickly vs. one that should've had the plug pulled on it yet it limped along for the entire gen.

LinkPizza posted...
SkynyrdRocker posted...
I never had a Dreamcast or Xbox. The Wii U is a criminally underrated system. I had a great time with it, it was the last console to offer free online, and virtual console (with N64 games!) is way better than a bunch of NES games no one cares about. If they had marketed it better, and if the default controller hadn't been an uncomfortable lump, it could've been very successful.

I actually liked the lump of a controller. Mostly because for a lot of games, I had a constant map...

I didn't like it, but the Pro controller was fairly affordable and excellent both in design/form and battery life, so I didn't care. I did like having 2 player games have the 2nd on the pad, split screen is just terrible, especially when games divide it into left/right instead of top/bottom.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1