LogFAQs > #924014427

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	People that complain about a lack of original movies are so annoying :/
Zithers 06/29/19 1:52:06 PM #26:	OctilIery posted... Zithers posted... This dude thinks trickle down economics works for movies/art! No studio has ever financed a small indie project because their dumb sequel/spinoff/superhero movie did well at the box office. Laughable. It's literally been explicitly done in many situations. Directors, for instance, will agree to big projects to secure funding for smaller passion projects. This has been done several times. But the greater meaning was that without those big successes, they don't have the money for smaller indie projects. Not even going to respond to the rest because you sound like an absolute caricature of the worst elitist, gatekeeping movie critics. I would love to know which directors have done that. Preferably good, original filmmakers, since you say that original filmmaking is so rampant today (lol!). Also I can't gatekeep even if I wanted to. It has literally never been easier to become a cinephile if you want to. Between Turner Classic Movies, YouTube, pirating, physical media, the Criterion Channel, Prime, etc there are so many avenues to become interested in world/indie/classic movies. But nobody does, lol! Culture is dying! Bow down to your conglomerate overlords and watch their homogenized, create-by-committee gutter filth! Lose all curiosity! Stan nostalgia-based remakes! Devour whatever they shovel into your mouth! Lmao! --- http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m02lct2g9l1qdlvg6o1_500.gif https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1283-quality-cinema-club <cite>Zithers posted [p:924014427] in People tha... [t:77820009]...</cite> <quote><cite>OctilIery posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zithers posted...</cite> <quote>This dude thinks trickle down economics works for movies/art! No studio has ever financed a small indie project because their dumb sequel/spinoff/superhero movie did well at the box office. Laughable.</quote> It's literally been explicitly done in many situations. Directors, for instance, will agree to big projects to secure funding for smaller passion projects. This has been done several times. But the greater meaning was that without those big successes, they don't have the money for smaller indie projects. Not even going to respond to the rest because you sound like an absolute caricature of the worst elitist, gatekeeping movie critics.</quote> I would love to know which directors have done that. Preferably good, original filmmakers, since you say that original filmmaking is so rampant today (lol!). Also I can't gatekeep even if I wanted to. It has literally never been easier to become a cinephile if you want to. Between Turner Classic Movies, YouTube, pirating, physical media, the Criterion Channel, Prime, etc there are so many avenues to become interested in world/indie/classic movies. But nobody does, lol! Culture is dying! Bow down to your conglomerate overlords and watch their homogenized, create-by-committee gutter filth! Lose all curiosity! Stan nostalgia-based remakes! Devour whatever they shovel into your mouth! Lmao! --- http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m02lct2g9l1qdlvg6o1_500.gif https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1283-quality-cinema-club</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1