LogFAQs > #923954850

Lirishae posted...

aDirtyShisno posted...

Let me explain it in your terms.

Charging the shooter would be like charging a woman for allowing herself to be attacked.

Capiche?

No, it would be charging her for responding to a situation with deadly force when she was not in danger of serious bodily harm. You can't go around shooting everyone because you're "afraid," or at least you're not supposed to be able to.

Depends on the State laws and the specific situation. The article doesnt specify what happened but does state that the mother instigated the fight, and that the shooter was charged initially but those charges were dropped by a grand jury. These series of events suggest that whatever specifically happened suggested that lethal force may have been warranted for adequate self defense.
---

Que sera, sera. Whatever happens, happens.
...and he was never heard from again.