So are you denying that companies like Google, Facebook and apple are working directly with governments to control the information that the citizens see? And you're still defending them as a "private company?"
So, let me get this straight. The Republican-controlled executive branch is conspiring with tech companies to...censor conservatives? And if you don't think Google is a private company entitled to make its own decisions, you want the government to do what? Regulate it? Break it up? Take it over?
aDirtyShisno posted...
In addition, Google and YouTube have specifically been given immunity by Congress as a platform from content on their platform. What this means is that if you commit a crime on their platform they are not responsible.
That's not "special immunity." That's just good ol' Section 230. You're regurgitating a bogus argument that tries to claim that moderating their content means they should lose their immunity. But if platform holders lose this immunity, they will either shut down or massively censor everyone to avoid liability.
aDirtyShisno posted...
Just because two thirds of what I stated is currently underway and the final third will become true in a matter of days does not make my statement less true. Undocumented immigrants are being provided several programs free of charge. Just because not all of them can and/or will take advantage of all of those programs does not make it less true.
Here's what you said:
aDirtyShisno posted...
If someone committed the crime of entering the country illegally they are being rewarded with free healthcare, free tuition, and free drivers licenses, at least in California. They are probably being given even more than that, but thats just off the top of my head.
And here's what you proved:
"California is planning to give select illegal immigrants the option to enroll in means-tested healthcare."
Do you have any proof for your other statements?
No other publisher has that immunity. It was not intended for publishers and YouTube is overstepping its bounds by operating as one.
As to the rest, were not going to argue semantics over your inability to grasp the English language. You already agreed that I am right in principle, theres no reason to prove or disprove that I was 100% completely accurate in how it was articulated. ---
Que sera, sera. Whatever happens, happens. ...and he was never heard from again.