LogFAQs > #922190687

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	People who hated the GoT finale: how would you have done it? (spoilers)
Knowledge_King 05/21/19 3:42:10 PM #86:	umax555 posted... They did give Jon a reason. That was the point of the whole conversation with Tyrion. Even though she hadn't threatened Sansa and Arya yet, it was obvious that they would be in danger and Jon realized this. Yeah, maybe they could have somebody kill him out of vengeance. Whether they did or not would have been fine IMO. Arya killing Dany would have been really dumb. She already killed the Night King, so her killing Dany as well would have been a bit much. Not to mention she had almost no interaction with Dany throughout the entire show. While Bran as king might be kind of underwhelming for a lot of people, it made the most sense given the circumstances. Too many people hated John, and Sansa preferred to rule the north. I liked it because it wasn't predictable yet still made sense. Jon had no reason. If someone tells you 'hey the person you love might kill someone else you love', that's not reason to kill them. It's speculation. To kill someone off of speculation is the opposite of what Jon Snow does. He only works off of action and it has to be extreme. Arya killing Dany makes sense. Who cares about 'points' and who she already killed. It makes sense with the plot and the characters. She saw the destruction, she never trusted Dany, and she thinks Dany wants to kill Jon, who she loved. Bran's a terrible king. He's terrible as a symbol (important for a king) and is too detached to rule efficiently. He's also never been shown to make good decisions. Almost anyone else is a better choice. A cripple who's literally just from the north but claims to be an all-seeing prophet is like...bottom five choices to be king. --- http://www.warwithwords.com Run: 5 star review, IndieReader approved: https://www.amazon.com/Run-M-N/dp/1973143763/ <cite>Knowledge_King posted [p:922190687] in People who... [t:77729201]...</cite> <quote><cite>umax555 posted...</cite> <quote> They did give Jon a reason. That was the point of the whole conversation with Tyrion. Even though she hadn't threatened Sansa and Arya yet, it was obvious that they would be in danger and Jon realized this. Yeah, maybe they could have somebody kill him out of vengeance. Whether they did or not would have been fine IMO. Arya killing Dany would have been really dumb. She already killed the Night King, so her killing Dany as well would have been a bit much. Not to mention she had almost no interaction with Dany throughout the entire show. While Bran as king might be kind of underwhelming for a lot of people, it made the most sense given the circumstances. Too many people hated John, and Sansa preferred to rule the north. I liked it because it wasn't predictable yet still made sense. </quote> Jon had no reason. If someone tells you 'hey the person you love might kill someone else you love', that's not reason to kill them. It's speculation. To kill someone off of speculation is the opposite of what Jon Snow does. He only works off of action and it has to be extreme. Arya killing Dany makes sense. Who cares about 'points' and who she already killed. It makes sense with the plot and the characters. She saw the destruction, she never trusted Dany, and she thinks Dany wants to kill Jon, who she loved. Bran's a terrible king. He's terrible as a symbol (important for a king) and is too detached to rule efficiently. He's also never been shown to make good decisions. Almost anyone else is a better choice. A cripple who's literally just from the north but claims to be an all-seeing prophet is like...bottom five choices to be king. --- http://www.warwithwords.com Run: 5 star review, IndieReader approved: https://www.amazon.com/Run-M-N/dp/1973143763/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1