LogFAQs > #921828253

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Guys I don't think projareds wife is all that innocent in this
JTilly 05/13/19 4:59:01 AM #50:	MrMallard posted... You're still immature at 16, both by the letter of the law in most respects and usually in personality as well - the only people pursuing 16 year olds in any capacity should be around 16 years old themselves. "Don't call them children" - they're still going to school, they're not old enough to drink or sign legal contracts without an adult present, and I'm pretty sure there are laws preventing 16 year olds from fucking fully fledged older adults? Shit, most people are completely different people at 19 than when they were 16. I don't know why you're being so persistent in insisting that being sexually interested in 16 year olds is respecting their oncoming maturity. It's fucking creepy, and I think it's still considered ephebophilia depending on your age and intentions. When did I ever imply being interested in a 16 year old is okay? The only point I ever tried to make was labeling a 16 year old as a child sounds silly. I do not condone nudes of anybody below 18 --- WittleJimmyJimmyjumper <cite>JTilly posted [p:921828253] in Guys I don... [t:77709908]...</cite> <quote><cite>MrMallard posted...</cite> <quote>You're still immature at 16, both by the letter of the law in most respects and usually in personality as well - the only people pursuing 16 year olds in any capacity should be around 16 years old themselves. "Don't call them children" - they're still going to school, they're not old enough to drink or sign legal contracts without an adult present, and I'm pretty sure there are laws preventing 16 year olds from fucking fully fledged older adults? Shit, most people are completely different people at 19 than when they were 16. I don't know why you're being so persistent in insisting that being sexually interested in 16 year olds is respecting their oncoming maturity. It's fucking creepy, and I think it's still considered ephebophilia depending on your age and intentions.</quote> When did I ever imply being interested in a 16 year old is okay? The only point I ever tried to make was labeling a 16 year old as a child sounds silly. I do not condone nudes of anybody below 18 --- WittleJimmyJimmyjumper</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1