LogFAQs > #916399842

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	How is Trump's Approval rating still at 45%?
IronicFool 01/26/19 11:22:52 AM #92:	Zeus posted... This is the lamest cover for a poster mistaking somebody for another that I've seen in my great many years on the internet. If pointing out the literal definition of the word in question is the lamest cover you've ever heard, then I imagine everyone else has some really solid reasons. Maybe I'll say 'one' instead of 'you' next time, so you won't be confused by my plebeian prole speak, given your much greater intelligence. But I did go reread the original post I made quoting you, and it is indeed clear how one could think I mistook you for another poster I was arguing with, despite the fact that the line I quoted was essentially a summation of my posts up to that point. Clearly, I was mistaking you for the other person. That's why I used the word 'you'. Ignore the second definition of 'you' about any person in general, and ignore the conditional 'if' directly before the 'you' which would imply this second definition in context, clearly I mistook you for the other poster. How could I miss it? I mean, just look at this: IronicFool posted... Well, SINCE YOU PROPOSED, GameFAQS users GRTooCool and by short extension based on the following conversation Yellow, that most people are stupid to explain why the president has a 45% approval rating, I think it's safe to say you don't think it should be 45%. How didn't I see it before? Clearly I am entirely in the wrong, you have bested me. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyFQVZ2h0V8" data-time=" --- </sarcasm> <cite>IronicFool posted [p:916399842] in How is Tru... [t:77368084]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>This is the lamest cover for a poster mistaking somebody for another that I've seen in my great many years on the internet.</quote> If pointing out the literal definition of the word in question is the lamest cover you've ever heard, then I imagine everyone else has some really solid reasons. Maybe I'll say 'one' instead of 'you' next time, so you won't be confused by my plebeian prole speak, given your much greater intelligence. But I did go reread the original post I made quoting you, and it is indeed clear how one could think I mistook you for another poster I was arguing with, despite the fact that the line I quoted was essentially a summation of my posts up to that point. Clearly, I was mistaking you for the other person. That's why I used the word 'you'. Ignore the second definition of 'you' about any person in general, and ignore the conditional 'if' directly before the 'you' which would imply this second definition in context, clearly I mistook you for the other poster. How could I miss it? I mean, just look at this: <cite>IronicFool posted...</cite> <quote>Well, SINCE YOU PROPOSED, GameFAQS users GRTooCool and by short extension based on the following conversation Yellow, that most people are stupid to explain why the president has a 45% approval rating, I think it's safe to say you don't think it should be 45%.</quote> How didn't I see it before? Clearly I am entirely in the wrong, you have bested me. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyFQVZ2h0V8" data-time=" --- </sarcasm></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1