LogFAQs > #914894823

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	I was dumb enough to think Notre Dame actually had a chance this game.
Corrik 12/29/18 8:17:08 PM #23:	eaedwards6400 posted... I'm not going to pretend that was a close game but listen to this argument. During 3/4 Clemson touchdowns occured while NDs best defensive back was not on the field. With Julian Love out Notre Dame is unable to rusher the passer because now Drue Tranquil now has to help Loves backup. This gives Trevor Lawrence more time and thus gives his guys more time to get open. All of Clemson's touchdowns were 20+ yards. Only one occured while Julian Love was on the field (and that was a run play). This is the dumbest thing I have heard to justify the loss. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:914894823] in I was dumb... [t:77344243]...</cite> <quote><cite>eaedwards6400 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm not going to pretend that was a close game but listen to this argument. During 3/4 Clemson touchdowns occured while NDs best defensive back was not on the field. With Julian Love out Notre Dame is unable to rusher the passer because now Drue Tranquil now has to help Loves backup. This gives Trevor Lawrence more time and thus gives his guys more time to get open. All of Clemson's touchdowns were 20+ yards. Only one occured while Julian Love was on the field (and that was a run play).</quote> This is the dumbest thing I have heard to justify the loss. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1