LogFAQs > #914743341

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	I humans evolved from apes, why are there still apes?
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 5:44:01 PM #168:	Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Here are some links for you to read at your earliest convenience, from the scientists that I mentioned above: https://www.trueorigin.org/design01.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner1.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner2.php That non peer reviewed article was done in the 2000s with outdated and faulty science. It's also done on a site that was specifically meant to push that narrative which usually aren't trustworthy. Give me an reputable study that was peer reviewed. Though given that you're actually arguing that humans walked beside dinosaurs I can tell you're just trolling. How is it outdated and faulty science? I own that site. Darwin was never peer-reviewed, too. The claim that mutations can't generate information has been debunked for awhile https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13673-evolution-myths-mutations-can-only-destroy-information/ The entirety of that site is just outdated. Darwin's studies were corroborated by future scientists who all peer reviewed their findings which is why evolution is an accepted theory among any educated individuals. No. That link doesn't answer anything. My site is nowhere near being outdated. Also, why do you think Darwin had any original studies when it looks like he plagiarized ideas from Edward Blyth? --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914743341] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>Here are some links for you to read at your earliest convenience, from the scientists that I mentioned above: https://www.trueorigin.org/design01.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner1.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner2.php</quote> That non peer reviewed article was done in the 2000s with outdated and faulty science. It's also done on a site that was specifically meant to push that narrative which usually aren't trustworthy. Give me an reputable study that was peer reviewed. Though given that you're actually arguing that humans walked beside dinosaurs I can tell you're just trolling.</quote> How is it outdated and faulty science? I own that site. Darwin was never peer-reviewed, too.</quote> The claim that mutations can't generate information has been debunked for awhile https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13673-evolution-myths-mutations-can-only-destroy-information/ The entirety of that site is just outdated. Darwin's studies were corroborated by future scientists who all peer reviewed their findings which is why evolution is an accepted theory among any educated individuals.</quote> No. That link doesn't answer anything. My site is nowhere near being outdated. Also, why do you think Darwin had any original studies when it looks like he plagiarized ideas from Edward Blyth? --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1