Yes, it is. If I'm not an idiot, it's up to me to show you that I'm not. My posts have always been on point with science and everyone ITT has not countered any of my posts with scientific fact. You, on the other hand, see fit to call me names because you cant counter my posts properly, or even commented on because you enjoy using ad hominems. LOL. It seems that you get severly butthurt when your pet theory of evolution gets criticized and or shown to be in serious error.
All you're doing is proving my point. Your posts have been completely against science and biology and you've just just been repeating "nope not true" like a child without providing any source of your own. If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not ad hominem to point out that they are. You've not made a single genuine argument in this topic.
I'm not arguing like an idiot, though. I have provided many reasons for my beliefs in this topic and I will continue to do so. My posts have not been completely against science and biology. The way you say this means you didn't take the time to read through my well reasoned posts. I also am not merely saying "Nope not true," I am also providing reasons and arguments that you haven't properly countered yet in this topic. You say this: 'If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not an ad hominem to point out that they are." That seems contradictory to say that, when you deny something as formal as a blatant fallacy; it is an hom in the end.
How are my arguments not genuine? I have researched a lot of the time in my free time, and no one has shown that we evolved from something, much less great apes or from any hypothetical common ancestor that has not even been proved to exist in the first place.
Show me a post you've made in this topic that was a genuine argument with logical reasoning. The only posts you've made on the entire front page was you going "nope, not true, that's not evidence" despite peer consensus with pretty much every scientist is that it is and "if we're apes how come babies don't like apes" which is troll responses made to make fun of how stupid people who are anti-evolution are. And ad hominem is reserved for genuine discussion. Something you haven't been doing. If someone insists the sky is purple with no evidence then it's not ad hominem to say they have eye issues or are delusional.
1. Every post in this topic that is made by me has been nothing but genuine. 2. Peer Consensus? Which peers say would you think they say? 3. Not every scientist alive today agrees with you. 4. If we really came from apes, and are apes, then you'd need to show how we are apes when little babies are born. Human babies look nothing like baby apes. Do you think human babies look like apes when they're born? 4. Me asking serious questions and typing out reasoned posts like the ones I have made ITT are not trolling posts; they're genuine. 5. I HAVE been genuine. 5. You deny using ad hominem against me in any of your extremely stupid posts itt. You have used many ad hominems against me in this topic here and don't do a good job of hiding that fact. ---
I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams.