LogFAQs > #914729922

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicStudent told to remove 'Fuck Nazi' sign because it wasn't 'Inclusive'
Dyinglegacy
12/26/18 12:20:58 PM
#23:


pogo_rabid posted...
Hey, if you're in for a penny, you're in for a pound.

Can't have your cake and eat it too.


Unfortunately, this is the way certain people see it today. There shouldn't have to be a clause indicating what inclusion does not accommodate. By using basic reasoning, it SHOULD be understand that inclusion is meant for harmless inclusion, not inclusion that will cause harm.

For instance, we shouldn't have to say something like: All are welcome, except for serial killers, rapists and practicing pedophiles. That much should be easily inferred with common sense. Similar to the examples above, Nazism is harmful, and we shouldn't have to even bring it into question when discussing whether or not the philosophy should be included. The answer should be an easy no.
---
Voted worst user on CE 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017
Current e-argument streak: 0 wins. 50001 losses.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1