LogFAQs > #914703542

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
darkjedilink 12/25/18 7:09:39 PM #103:	wiiking96 posted... darkjedilink posted... wiiking96 posted... darkjedilink posted... The very concept of 'social justice' is malicious, and anyone suggesting otherwise is either an idiot or a thief. I think you and me have very different ideas of what "social justice" in entails. Then define it. The generally-accepted definition, that we get 'justice' for the disenfranchised by punishing the groups that benefited by that disenfranchisement at some point in history, is malicious on its face. Since when the hell was that the generally-accepted definition? I'm not sure what the best definition of social justice is. I don't know how to best put it into words, such it's such a broad concept. But I feel like pointing out that there are groups in society that currently directly benefit from the disenfranchisement of minorities and poor people, especially the wealthy and powerful. There are people stuck working in sweatshops making products to benefit the bottom lines of huge corporations. Thanks to globalism, pushed by liberals and SJW's. Don't believe me? It's literally the argument used by the left to defend illegal immigration - 'we need them for cheap labor!' --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:914703542] in Don't beli... [t:77330679]...</cite> <quote><cite>wiiking96 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wiiking96 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>The very concept of 'social justice' is malicious, and anyone suggesting otherwise is either an idiot or a thief.</quote> I think you and me have very different ideas of what "social justice" in entails.</quote> Then define it. The generally-accepted definition, that we get 'justice' for the disenfranchised by punishing the groups that benefited by that disenfranchisement at some point in history, is malicious on its face.</quote> Since when the hell was that the generally-accepted definition? I'm not sure what the best definition of social justice is. I don't know how to best put it into words, such it's such a broad concept. But I feel like pointing out that there are groups in society that currently directly benefit from the disenfranchisement of minorities and poor people, especially the wealthy and powerful. There are people stuck working in sweatshops making products to benefit the bottom lines of huge corporations.</quote> Thanks to globalism, pushed by liberals and SJW's. Don't believe me? It's literally the argument used by the left to defend illegal immigration - 'we need them for cheap labor!' --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1