| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | Judge ruled officers had no duty to protect students in parkland shooting. |
| Offworlder1 12/19/18 11:39:42 AM #48: | Here it is as plain as day, police are not obligated to protect people not in their custody, the fact that: neither the constitution or state law impose a general duty upon police officers or other governmental officials to protect induvidual persons from harm even when they know the harm will occur is proof people should not and can not depend on the police to keep them safe. Police can watch someone attack you, refuse to intervene and not violate the constitution is one huge so you really think only cops should have guns now ? question I ask everyone now when those police are not there to keep anyone safe. With these facts there is no reason at all to oppose self defense and owning firearms. Unless you can hire a bodyguard owning a gun is the best way to keep your loved ones and yourself safe since you clearly cant depend on the police to save you or keep you from harm. --- "Always two there are, a master and an apprentice" 3DS FC: 1564 - 7512 - 1815 ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |