LogFAQs > #914091524

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	C/D: Lawyers who KNOWINGLY defend guilty clients should be punished too.
NotWhiteNinja 12/13/18 11:01:38 PM #54:	MC_BatCommander posted... NotWhiteNinja posted... Imagine thinking there's nothing wrong with them doing this. Wow. Just wow. well you literally think that lawyers who fulfill someone's constitutional right to a defense should be punished so \_()_/ So I take it that anything in the constitution, you believe should be blindly upheld, and not questioned and possibly changed? Does that include the 2nd and 13th Amendments (since it's pretty rare to find someone who agrees with both)? (Yes, it would have to be through the proper process for passing an amendment. I'm not arguing against that.) EDIT: I think I cited the wrong amendment here. One sec. --- Nope. I'm totally not the white ninja. You're confusing me with someone else. <cite>NotWhiteNinja posted [p:914091524] in C/D: Lawye... [t:77299719]...</cite> <quote><cite>MC_BatCommander posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NotWhiteNinja posted...</cite> <quote>Imagine thinking there's nothing wrong with them doing this. Wow. Just wow.</quote> well you literally think that lawyers who fulfill someone's constitutional right to a defense should be punished so \_()_/</quote> So I take it that anything in the constitution, you believe should be blindly upheld, and not questioned and possibly changed? Does that include the 2nd and 13th Amendments (since it's pretty rare to find someone who agrees with both)? (Yes, it would have to be through the proper process for passing an amendment. I'm not arguing against that.) EDIT: I think I cited the wrong amendment here. One sec. --- Nope. I'm totally not the white ninja. You're confusing me with someone else.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1