LogFAQs > #914038523

What if Samus/Snake was accurate, though, and that Samus/Tifa was the match that was off (as in, Tifa overperformed)? I know that makes Samus ridiculously strong, but I'm just throwing that possibility out there! Isn't it funny how the only two opponents we have to measure Samus are opponents where Samus previously had debatably wonky match results with? In 2005 Tifa overperformed on Samus (and possibly 2013, too) and people still debate on whether Samus/Snake 2006 wasn't accurate, either....

That's why we need to see Samus vs. Cloud!

So the idea is that Zelda was fairly consistent all the way through Zelda vs. Sonic. And then Zelda increased in bandwagon strength through Mario/Zelda and Link/Zelda and now we have a stronger Zelda against Cloud. It actually sounds pretty logical. I don't think I would change KKP's placement of Zelda and Snake. Still, I wonder if Sonic really is weaker than Luigi.... granted, I like how Tifa and MMX are given some credit for their strength. And Luigi is placed above Bowser and Yoshi, which I think is correct.

Sephiroth's performance were really inconsistent. His matches against Captain Falcon and Ryu suggest the stronger Sephiroth, but his performances on Mario, Amaterasu and Wesker suggest the weaker Sephiroth. What's funny, though, is that even the weaker Sephiroth that KKP uses is still above Sonic.
---

"Ah, a party! We haven't had one of those. It could be fun! So... what is a party?" "Well, you drink punch and eat CAKE! ...I think."